<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>spousal consent on Referently.com</title>
    <link>https://referently.com/tags/spousal-consent/</link>
    <description>Recent content in spousal consent on Referently.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://referently.com/tags/spousal-consent/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Expanding Spousal Consent for 401(k)s: The Policy Trade-offs Congress Is Weighing</title>
      <link>https://referently.com/expanding-spousal-consent-for-401ks-the-policy-trade-offs-congress-is-weighing/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://referently.com/expanding-spousal-consent-for-401ks-the-policy-trade-offs-congress-is-weighing/</guid>
      <description>Extending spousal consent requirements to all defined contribution plans sounds straightforward on paper. If a spouse can veto a beneficiary change in most 401(k) plans, why can&amp;rsquo;t they veto a $50,000 withdrawal? The answer, according to a March 2026 GAO report, is a web of administrative, legal, and philosophical trade-offs that make the issue considerably more complex than it first appears.
The Case for Expanding Requirements The current system is, as the GAO frames it, a historical accident.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>How the Federal Government&#39;s Own Retirement Plan Handles Spousal Consent — and Where It Falls Short</title>
      <link>https://referently.com/how-the-federal-governments-own-retirement-plan-handles-spousal-consent-and-where-it-falls-short/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://referently.com/how-the-federal-governments-own-retirement-plan-handles-spousal-consent-and-where-it-falls-short/</guid>
      <description>The Thrift Savings Plan is the largest defined contribution plan in the United States, covering 7.2 million federal civilian employees and uniformed service members with $963 billion in assets as of December 2024. It is also one of the few defined contribution plans in the country that actually requires spousal consent before a participant can remove funds.
A March 2026 GAO report examining spousal protections across the retirement system offers a detailed look at how the TSP&amp;rsquo;s consent framework works — including its notable gap on beneficiary designations.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>IRAs Hold $17 Trillion — and Offer Spouses Zero Federal Protection</title>
      <link>https://referently.com/iras-hold-17-trillion-and-offer-spouses-zero-federal-protection/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://referently.com/iras-hold-17-trillion-and-offer-spouses-zero-federal-protection/</guid>
      <description>The debate over spousal consent in 401(k) plans tends to overshadow a quieter but equally significant gap in the retirement protection system: Individual Retirement Accounts are entirely outside the federal spousal consent framework, and they&amp;rsquo;re bigger than the entire defined contribution plan market.
According to figures cited in a March 2026 GAO report on spousal retirement protections, IRAs held $17 trillion in assets at the end of 2024, compared to $12 trillion across all defined contribution plans.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Most 401(k) Plans Let Spouses Drain Retirement Accounts Without Your Knowledge</title>
      <link>https://referently.com/most-401k-plans-let-spouses-drain-retirement-accounts-without-your-knowledge/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://referently.com/most-401k-plans-let-spouses-drain-retirement-accounts-without-your-knowledge/</guid>
      <description>A new report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) has confirmed what many divorce attorneys already know firsthand: the vast majority of defined contribution retirement plans — including the ubiquitous 401(k) — allow a married participant to take out loans, make withdrawals, and receive distributions without their spouse ever being informed, let alone asked.
The report, GAO-26-107536, published in March 2026, was requested by members of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, and examined three core questions: when spousal consent is actually required, what happens to spouses when it isn&amp;rsquo;t obtained, and what the trade-offs of expanding consent requirements would be.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
