<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>identity online on Referently.com</title>
    <link>https://referently.com/tags/identity-online/</link>
    <description>Recent content in identity online on Referently.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://referently.com/tags/identity-online/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Referenced by X: Why This Matters</title>
      <link>https://referently.com/referenced-by-x-why-this-matters/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://referently.com/referenced-by-x-why-this-matters/</guid>
      <description>“Referenced by X” looks like a small detail, almost decorative at first glance. A name attached to an idea, a link to a person behind a recommendation. Easy to overlook. But that simple attribution changes how information is interpreted more than most people realize.
Without attribution, content exists in a kind of neutral space. It might be useful, well-written, even accurate—but it lacks orientation. You don’t know who stands behind it, what their perspective is, or why they’re presenting it in that particular way.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The Future of Professional References Beyond LinkedIn</title>
      <link>https://referently.com/the-future-of-professional-references-beyond-linkedin/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://referently.com/the-future-of-professional-references-beyond-linkedin/</guid>
      <description>Something has been off about professional references for a while now, even if most people haven’t quite said it out loud. You scroll through profiles, endorsements, recommendations—everything looks polished, consistent, almost frictionless. Too frictionless, maybe. The signal is there, but it’s buried under a layer of performative credibility that feels more like formatting than proof. LinkedIn didn’t break professional references, it standardized them to the point where differentiation became harder.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
