<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>eu on Referently.com</title>
    <link>https://referently.com/tags/eu/</link>
    <description>Recent content in eu on Referently.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://referently.com/tags/eu/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Trump Wants Tariffs Over Google&#39;s EU Fine While US Courts Just Blocked the Same Policy at Home</title>
      <link>https://referently.com/trump-wants-tariffs-over-googles-eu-fine-while-us-courts-just-blocked-the-same-policy-at-home/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://referently.com/trump-wants-tariffs-over-googles-eu-fine-while-us-courts-just-blocked-the-same-policy-at-home/</guid>
      <description>I think Big Tech gets away with treating &amp;ldquo;user safety&amp;rdquo; as a compliance checkbox more often than it should, and I&amp;rsquo;ve said so in this space before. If a $1 billion fine landed on Google for something a European regulator plausibly called a child-safety failure, my first instinct is to side with the regulator.
My first instinct is wrong here, and not for the reason Google&amp;rsquo;s lobbyists would give you.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
