I expected the Delhi High Court’s ruling on ANI versus OpenAI to go the other way. News agencies have made real headway in other jurisdictions arguing that training on their reporting is itself the infringement, and I assumed an Indian court would lean toward the plaintiff on a fact pattern this sympathetic. It didn’t, and the reasoning it used is the more interesting story than the outcome. The Delhi High Court ruled that OpenAI’s use of ANI content to train ChatGPT wasn’t copyright infringement, because ANI didn’t show that ChatGPT actually reproduced its reports.

A bench trial is a trial decided by a judge alone, without a jury. A jury trial is decided by a panel of citizens. The choice between them — where one exists — is among the most consequential strategic decisions in litigation, with implications that reach from legal theory to psychology to the specific facts of the case. What They Are In a jury trial, the jury is the finder of fact.

A writ of mandamus is a court order commanding a government official, lower court, or government body to perform a duty that is purely ministerial — one that the law requires them to perform and that they have refused or failed to carry out. It is an extraordinary remedy, not a routine one, and courts grant it sparingly. What It Is Mandamus sits in the category of extraordinary writs — legal tools that exist outside the normal appellate process and are available only when ordinary remedies are inadequate.