<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>audit on Referently.com</title>
    <link>https://referently.com/tags/audit/</link>
    <description>Recent content in audit on Referently.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://referently.com/tags/audit/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Going Concern Opinion</title>
      <link>https://referently.com/going-concern-opinion/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://referently.com/going-concern-opinion/</guid>
      <description>A going concern opinion is an auditor&amp;rsquo;s formal statement that there is substantial doubt about a company&amp;rsquo;s ability to continue operating for the next twelve months. It is among the most consequential disclosures in financial reporting — and one of the most misread by investors encountering it for the first time.
What It Is Financial statements are prepared on the assumption that the entity will continue as a going concern — that it will remain in business long enough to realize its assets and fulfill its obligations in the ordinary course of operations.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Material Weakness vs. Significant Deficiency</title>
      <link>https://referently.com/material-weakness-vs.-significant-deficiency/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://referently.com/material-weakness-vs.-significant-deficiency/</guid>
      <description>A material weakness and a significant deficiency are both deficiencies in a company&amp;rsquo;s internal controls over financial reporting — but they sit at different points on the severity scale, and the consequences of each are substantially different.
What They Are Internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) are the processes a company uses to ensure that its financial statements are accurate. Auditors and management evaluate these controls under frameworks like COSO and standards like PCAOB AS 2201 (for U.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>SAB 99 Materiality</title>
      <link>https://referently.com/sab-99-materiality/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://referently.com/sab-99-materiality/</guid>
      <description>SAB 99 — Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99, issued by the SEC in 1999 — established the authoritative framework for assessing whether a misstatement in financial statements is material and therefore requires correction or disclosure. It is the document that killed the &amp;ldquo;5% rule&amp;rdquo; as a reliable safe harbor.
What It Is Before SAB 99, a widespread informal practice held that misstatements below 5% of net income were automatically immaterial and could be left uncorrected.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
